Is Rolling Stone magazine just a joke now? - quest to find the stone of dreams game
I used to think that Rolling Stone had some credibility and integrity when it comes to music critics. When I heard Panic! at the Disco was initially skeptical but are willing to let go. I know checked the website and some older CD reviews, and these guys anything about the music? I have not a single report on the website for those who can not see, some now! compilation (which is bad). In addition, reviewers bands like Nickelback, Fall Out Boy praised, Panic! And Trivium, and artists such as Switchfoot criticized because they are too general. The test itself Joe Satriani Flying In A Blue Dream not only be boring finger exercises criticized. It seems that they are trying to appease less intelligent music critics very informative and the fans of pop music in their efforts to write to stifle originality.
2 comments:
Rolling Stone used to be cool, but now they are just lame. Led Zeppelin put his cover only a few months to keep the revenue. If she stayed with rock and roll will go on sale each month. But as soon as Britney Spears on the cover that has lost all credibility.
Rolling Stone has lost years ago. Aging probably should have tried, with their readers. Instead, they are trying like a bunch of old, the young people who buy most of the music appeals. I'm a little embarrassed for her.
I recently purchased a headset that comes with a card for a free mailing list unsubscribe send Rolling Stone. Not even time to send in
Post a Comment